Get your free practice interview for this role
Mercor screens applicants online, often with an AI interview. micro1 offers a free, 18-minute AI practice interview with feedback, and we picked the one closest to this role: Data Annotator. It covers:
Here’s your practice interview
Allow your microphone when it asks, find a quiet spot, and give yourself about 20 minutes. We’ve also emailed you the link and the free ebook.
Step 2: when you feel ready, apply.
The practice interview is free and run by micro1. Land Remote Jobs is an independent job board, not part of micro1, Mercor or Turing. Practising helps you prepare; it can’t guarantee the result of your real interview. Want more tips? Read our guide to acing the remote job interview.
Apply for this role
You apply on Mercor's own site. It’s free, and you can apply even if you skip the practice.
Who this role suits
Researchers and PhD holders who want to use their subject expertise on remote, flexible projects.
Full job description
About the work
Mercor is assembling a panel of chemistry domain experts to red-team frontier AI models. The goal is to test whether a model can correctly judge the misuse potential of a technical request; answering legitimate questions fully while refusing genuinely dangerous ones.
You will:
Write challenging single-turn prompts in your domain, labelled across three levels: benign, dual-use, and adversarial.
Evaluate the responses that come back against a defined policy standard, and judge whether each was handled correctly.
Write the reference answer — what a correct response looks like, and the technical reasoning for why.
The hard part is calibration, not difficulty. A benign prompt that a model wrongly refuses is as valuable as an adversarial one it wrongly answers. That judgment is why we need domain experts rather than generalists — in chemistry the line sits between mechanism and procedure, and only someone who has run the reaction knows exactly where it falls. Background we're looking for
We're looking for professionals with hands-on experience in synthesis, analytical chemistry, or chemical safety. Prior AI evaluation or red-teaming experience is preferred. Relevant backgrounds include:
Chemical Defense Researcher (USAMRICD, DoD, CDC) — toxicological agents and medical countermeasures.
Synthetic / Process Chemist — route design, reaction engineering and scale-up.
Analytical Chemist — detection and identification methods for hazardous compounds.
Industrial Hygienist / Process Safety Engineer — exposure assessment, toxic release and process hazard analysis.
Forensic / Toxicological Chemist — controlled substances, precursor identification and casework.
What this role demands beyond technical depth
This is writing-intensive work. Every judgment you make needs a written rationale that a non-specialist can follow. Prior technical writing, published research, or expert witness experience is a strong signal — please include a sample or link.
Prior AI red-teaming or model evaluation experience is a plus but not required.
You will also be reading and writing about misuse scenarios in your field for sustained periods. We brief experts on this in advance, and you can pause or step away at any point without penalty.
Before you apply
Your work here will not involve, and must not draw on, classified or export-controlled information, or anything covered by an NDA or prepublication review obligation. If you hold such obligations you may still be a good fit — tell us in your application and we will scope the work accordingly.
Last checked open on Nov 1, 2026. Job description provided by Mercor.
Something not working? Tell us
If the practice interview or the apply link doesn’t open, or the job looks closed, let us know and we’ll fix it.
Thanks, we got it. We’ll check this job’s links and reply by email if you left one.